Tit-for-tat? Tariff-for-tariff?
"Just as Trump "intends to fill America’s coffers with tariff revenues," Canada "can do the same," suggesting that Canada could re-distribute the revenue generated by counter-tariffs to workers hard hit by a tariff war."
– Chrystia Freeland paraphrased in Toronto Star article, MacCharles, Jan. 17. 2025
Foreign Affairs Minister Joly recently suggested that job losses from Trump's threatened tariffs would first occur to "the sectors most vulnerable to tariffs include manufacturing, mining, the energy sector, agriculture and forestry," and have knock-on effects "on other sectors, like retail, education, and health care."
Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau's planned tariff retaliation is on hold, waiting for Trump's next move.
Trudeau has indicated that 25% tariffs on $155B imported U.S. goods are waiting in the wings — and whether he employs them will depend on how Trump proceeds with trade negotiations.
If the holds come off and trade disruption occurs, Canada's businesses and industries will experience the shock of input cost and supply chain havoc, made even worse if energy prices rise.
The result could be an immediately deteriorating economy with higher unemployment, weaker GDP numbers, reduced consumer spending, and increasing inflation.
(The U.S. would likely also face economic turmoil, including job losses and higher inflation, which happened the last time Trump imposed only targeted tariffs in 2019.)
Would revenue from tariff retaliation be enough to cushion the tariff-induced inflation and job loss blow?
- Even with the additional revenue, Canadian consumers could face higher costs, eroding disposable income and dampening economic growth.
- Tariff revenues are unlikely to fully neutralize the inflationary pressures because they do not directly reduce consumer prices.
- While tariff revenue can be redirected to support workers or industries through targeted programs, historically, it has generally been insufficient to fully compensate for widespread job losses or economic disruption.
Our current federal government is talking 'tariff relief' — but could that worsen the economics?
Government tariff relief would likely also not be able to fully compensate for business or individual financial losses due to tariff trade disruption, though it may help in the short term.
However, the government borrowing necessary for such relief may eventually result in increased taxes and higher interest rates — as government spending can often come at an economic cost that's paid later.
What about reducing Canadian inter-provincial trade barriers to buffer the impact?
Yes, what a great idea (which isn't new...). Goods don't flow uninhibited within Canada, roughly the equivalent of 21% tariffs.
Several experts have mentioned that reducing trade barriers within Canada — yes, that means between provinces — might provide an economic boost when we need it most. According to Internal Trade Minister Anand, it could "lower prices by up to 15%, boost productivity by up to 7% and add up to $200B to the domestic economy." (CBC News, Feb. 5, 2025).
More free-flowing internal trade could also ease international partners' access to Canadian goods.
These barriers exist for several reasons, such as provincial industry protectionism and lack of standardization for things like food containers and sizes.
The Canada Free Trade Agreement was formed between 'Canada' and its provinces in 2017 to iron out some of these obstacles. However, it hasn't budged much since then, with "almost 400 pages of carve-outs and exceptions to free trade in Canada."
Perhaps it's what they say — good 'trade relationships' begin at home? Let's hope this neighbourly solution happens quickly.
Is there any silver lining to this trade dispute started by the U.S.?
It's obvious that major adjustments will need to be made, both in the short and long term.
Federal and provincial efforts to reduce regulatory barriers — such as interprovincial trade restrictions, homebuilding regulations, pipeline obstacles, and manufacturing constraints — could help improve local and international supply chains and economic resilience.
Streamlining these processes may also support Canada's ability to diversify global trade partnerships and mitigate economic disruptions.
Initiatives to 'Buy Canadian' to support local businesses are already underway, as many realize just how many daily purchases they make of 'American goods.'