Tit-for-tat? Tariff-for-tariff?
"Just as Trump "intends to fill America’s coffers with tariff revenues," Canada "can do the same," suggesting that Canada could re-distribute the revenue generated by counter-tariffs to workers hard hit by a tariff war."
– Chrystia Freeland paraphrased in Toronto Star article, MacCharles, Jan. 17. 2025
Foreign Affairs Minister Joly recently suggested that job losses from Trump's threatened tariffs would first occur to "the sectors most vulnerable to tariffs include manufacturing, mining, the energy sector, agriculture and forestry," and have knock-on effects "on other sectors, like retail, education, and health care."
Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau's planned tariff retaliation is on hold, waiting for Trump's next move.
Trudeau has indicated that 25% tariffs on $155B imported U.S. goods are being implemented in two phases, $30B on March 4 and $125B in three weeks (around March 25).
Canada's businesses and industries will experience the shock of input cost and supply chain havoc, made even worse if energy prices rise.
The result could be an immediately deteriorating economy with higher unemployment, weaker GDP numbers, reduced consumer spending, and increasing inflation.
(The U.S. would likely also face economic turmoil, including job losses and higher inflation, which happened the last time Trump imposed only targeted tariffs in 2019.)
However, a recent KPMG survey suggests that 67% of Canadian businesses have readied to weather a trade war that lasts more than a year.
Regardless of the turmoil Canada has been forced into, count on our people and companies to stand up and help contribute to building economic resilience.
Would revenue from tariff retaliation be enough to cushion the tariff-induced inflation and job loss blow?
- Even with the additional revenue, Canadian consumers could face higher costs, eroding disposable income and dampening economic growth.
- Tariff revenues are unlikely to fully neutralize the inflationary pressures because they do not directly reduce consumer prices.
- While tariff revenue can be redirected to support workers or industries through targeted programs, historically, it has generally been insufficient to fully compensate for widespread job losses or economic disruption.
Our current federal government is talking 'tariff relief' — but could that worsen the economics?
Government tariff relief would likely also not be able to fully compensate for business or individual financial losses due to tariff trade disruption, though it may help in the short term.
However, the government borrowing necessary for such relief may eventually result in increased taxes and higher interest rates — as government spending can often come at an economic cost that's paid later.
Reducing Canadian inter-provincial trade barriers will help buffer the impact
Healthy trade relationships begin at home. And on March 6, an unprecented agreement between Ottawa and most provinces is the first start to shore up our Canadian family.
Inter-provincial taps were finally opened, removing the barriers to selling alcohol across the country (P.E.I, and Newfoundland and Labrador have opted out, so far).
Will more inter-provincial industry barriers fall?
Before the 2025 U.S. tariff tiff, substantial inter-provincial trade restrictions and carve-outs were in place, designed to protect local businesses. Altogether, it was the equivalent of about 21% tariffs, despite a 2017 Canada Free Trade Agreement formed to iron out some of the obstacles.
Several experts have mentioned that reducing trade barriers within Canada might provide an economic boost when we need it most. According to Internal Trade Minister Anand, it could "lower prices by up to 15%, boost productivity by up to 7% and add up to $200B to the domestic economy." (CBC News, Feb. 5, 2025).
More free-flowing internal trade could also ease international partners' access to Canadian goods.
Is there any silver lining to this trade dispute started by the U.S.? Of course there is.
It's obvious that major adjustments will need to be made, both in the short and long term.
Federal and provincial efforts to reduce regulatory barriers — such as interprovincial trade restrictions, homebuilding regulations, pipeline obstacles, and manufacturing constraints — could help improve local and international supply chains and economic resilience.
Streamlining these processes may also support Canada's ability to diversify global trade partnerships and mitigate economic disruptions.
Initiatives to 'Buy Canadian' to support local businesses are already underway, as many realize just how many daily purchases they make of 'American goods.'